Waqf bill has ended monopoly: Jyotiraditya Scindia lashes out at opposition

ANI April 9, 2025 184 views

The Waqf Amendment Bill has ignited a significant political debate in India, with Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia strongly defending the legislation against opposition criticism. Prime Minister Narendra Modi argues the bill challenges historical "appeasement politics" and seeks to benefit marginalized communities. Several opposition parties, including Congress and AIMIM, have initiated legal challenges in the Supreme Court. The bill represents a pivotal moment in reforming the management of Waqf properties, focusing on transparency and public welfare.

"The opposition wants to run a monopoly and wants to misuse things" - Jyotiraditya Scindia
Gwalior, April 9: Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia lashed out at the opposition parties over their dissent against the recently passed Waqf Amendment Bill of 2025, saying that the opposition intends to run a "monopoly", which would be exposed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government in the centre.

Key Points

1

Waqf Bill aims to improve property management for public welfare

2

Modi government challenges traditional property oversight

3

Supreme Court legal battles emerge over bill's provisions

Scindia credited the Waqf bill with "ending" the monopoly and said the Waqf properties would be used for the public's welfare.

"The opposition wants to run a monopoly and wants to misuse things. The Prime Minister and the BJP government will expose them. Using Waqf properties for the welfare of the public is the ideology of everyone. Some people did not want the good use of Waqf, and this Bill has ended their monopoly," Scindia told reporters here.

PM Modi on Tuesday said that Waqf legislation would ensure dignity for all, especially the marginalised, and accused Congress of "appeasement politics".

PM Modi said "appeasement politics" has been a significant challenge to India's growth. Referring to the recent amendment to the Waqf-related laws passed by Parliament, the Prime Minister noted that the debate surrounding Waqf stems from the politics of appeasement, which is not a new phenomenon.

The Prime Minister said that Congress gained power through appeasement politics, and some extremist leaders made wealth. However, he questioned what the common Muslim received in return. He highlighted that poor and marginalised Muslims were left with neglect, illiteracy, and unemployment.

Meanwhile, people from the Muslim community organised a protest in Manipur's Bishnupur, demanding an immediate repeal of the Waqf Amendment Act. People took to the streets, holding banners and raising slogans while demanding immediate repeal of the act.

On April 5, President Droupadi Murmu gave her assent to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which was passed by Parliament during the budget session. The President also gave her assent to the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2025.

The Waqf Act has sparked controversy as opposing parties approach the Supreme Court to contest the bill's provisions, which they argue could have significant implications for the management of Waqf properties.

Congress and AIMIM, AAP and others have initiated their legal battle against the bill in the Supreme Court, expressing concerns over its potential impact on the management and oversight of Waqf properties in India.

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, was passed. It seeks to focus on improving the management of waqf properties, empowering stakeholders relevant to this, improving the efficiency of the survey, registration, and case disposal process, and developing waqf properties.

While the core purpose remains to manage waqf properties, the aim is to implement modern and scientific methods for better governance. The Mussalman Wakf Act of 1923 was also repealed.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Finally some good governance! Waqf properties should benefit everyone, not just a select few. Kudos to the government for this bold move 👏
S
Sunita M.
I'm not sure how I feel about this. While transparency is good, I hope the implementation won't negatively impact the Muslim community's religious properties. Need to see more details.
A
Amit P.
Scindia makes valid points about ending monopolies, but the political rhetoric from both sides is getting tiring. Can we just focus on development instead of constant blame games?
F
Fatima Z.
As a Muslim, I welcome reforms if they genuinely help the community. But the protests show many have concerns. The government should engage in dialogue rather than just political statements.
V
Vikram S.
The opposition's reaction proves Scindia's point about monopoly! All religious properties should be managed transparently. This is 2025, not 1923 - time for modernization!
P
Priya R.
Interesting development. Hope the Supreme Court gives a balanced verdict. Religious properties are sensitive matters that need careful handling. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Tags:
You May Like!