Loading NewKerala.com...

Waist circumference stronger risk marker than BMI for obesity-related cancer in men

IANS March 23, 2025 301 views

A recent study finds that waist circumference is a stronger indicator of obesity-related cancer risk in men compared to BMI. This distinction stems from the metabolically active nature of visceral fat, which is a significant risk factor. The study used data from over 339,000 Swedish participants and found that men's risk is particularly affected by waist size, unlike women who display different fat distribution patterns. These findings highlight the importance of considering waist size in evaluating cancer risks in men.

"Visceral fat is more metabolically active and implicated in adverse health outcomes." - Dr. Ming Sun
Waist circumference stronger risk marker than BMI for obesity-related cancer in men
New Delhi, March 23: Waist circumference (WC) is a stronger risk marker than BMI for developing obesity-related cancers in men, but not women, says a new study.

Key Points

1

Waist size better than BMI for cancer risk in men

2

Study analyzes 339,190 Swedish individuals

3

Men's visceral fat linked to higher cancer risk

4

WC less significant in women

BMI is a measure of body size, but does not provide information on fat distribution, whereas waist circumference is a proxy more closely related to abdominal adiposity.

“This distinction is crucial because visceral fat, which accumulates around the abdominal organs, is more metabolically active and has been implicated in adverse health outcomes, including insulin resistance, inflammation, and abnormal blood fat levels,” said the study conducted by Dr Ming Sun, Dr Josef Fritz and Dr Tanja Stocks.

Consequently, individuals with similar BMIs may have distinct cancer risks due to differences in fat distribution, they noted.

The study analysed data from 339,190 individuals collected from various Swedish populations who had undergone health assessments with BMI and WC assessments from 1981-2019 (61 per cent objectively measured, 39 per cent self-reported, mean age 51.4 years). Cancer diagnoses were obtained from the Swedish Cancer Register.

The authors calculated relative risks associated with obesity-related cancers for WC and BMI, taking into account multiple factors that could influence the results, such as age, smoking habits, and sociodemographic factors including education level, income, birth country and marital status.

During a median follow-up of 14 years, 18,185 established obesity-related cancers were recorded.

After accounting for BMI, high WC still remained a risk factor for obesity-related cancer in men. This suggests that the elevated risk associated with abdominal adiposity is specific, and not explained by high body size alone, as measured by BMI.

Among women, the associations were weaker and similar for both WC and BMI.

“A plausible explanation is that men are more likely to store fat viscerally, while women generally accumulate more subcutaneous and peripheral fat,” said authors in Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Including hip circumference into risk models may provide further insights into this sex difference and enhance the association between WC and cancer, particularly for women, they added.

—IANS

Tags:
You May Like!