No Internet, Bluetooth in Indian EVMs make them unhackable: ECI sources

IANS April 11, 2025 329 views

India's Election Commission has strongly defended the integrity of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) against potential hacking allegations. The ECI emphasizes that Indian EVMs are fundamentally different from US voting systems, with no internet or wireless connectivity. Officials point to Supreme Court validation and extensive verification processes as proof of the machines' reliability. The statement comes amid ongoing debates about electronic voting system vulnerabilities, particularly in the context of opposition parties questioning EVM fairness.

"These machines have stood legal scrutiny by the Supreme Court of India" - ECI Official
No Internet, Bluetooth in Indian EVMs make them unhackable: ECI sources
New Delhi, April 11: A US official's claim over possible hacking of electronic voting systems in that country was on Friday met with a reassuring calm by the Election Commission of India (ECI) with sources highlighting the Indian EVMs' superior technology and no use of Internet or Bluetooth during voting as foolproof shields against manipulation.

Key Points

1

ECI claims EVMs are superior to US voting systems

2

No internet or wireless connectivity possible

3

Supreme Court has validated machine's reliability

4

5 crore VVPAT slips verified during counting

The US official, in a viral video circulating on social media, made the claim about election integrity while referring to on-going probe in that country into ‘flaws’ in electronic voting systems and urged a switch to paper ballots.

Claiming that there was no reason for an alarm, sources at ECI said that the US and the Indian EVMs were not comparable due to several additional security measures incorporated into our machines.

“Some countries use Electronic Voting Systems, which are a mix of multiple systems, machines and processes including various private networks including Internet etc. India uses EVMs which work like simple, correct and accurate calculators and cannot be connected to either Internet, WiFi or Infrared," said an ECI source.

Reassuring voters and the Indian public, an election panel official said: “These machines have stood legal scrutiny by the Supreme Court of India and are invariably checked by the political parties at various stages, including the conduct of mock polls before polling starts. More than 5 crore voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips have been verified and matched while counting in front of political parties.”

Earlier, the US official said in the video, posted on social media platform X: “We have evidence of how these electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a very long time and vulnerable to exploitation to manipulate the results of the votes being cast, which further drives forward your mandate to bring about paper ballots across the country so that voters can have faith in the integrity of our elections."

The US debate over the vulnerability of electronic voting systems in that country comes at a time when the Opposition parties, led by the Congress, in India have made several attempts to blame the EVMs for its repeated poll debacles.

After the Congress’ rout in the Haryana and Maharashtra Assembly elections in 2024, the Congress had blamed the ‘biased and fixed’ EVMs.

Apart from Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Nationalist Congress Party chief Sharad Pawer and Jharkhand Mukti Morcha General Secretary Supriyo Bhattacharya have regularly raised questions over EVMs.

However, the BJP has constantly criticised the Opposition parties for their inconsistent stance on EVMs.

"When Priyanka Gandhi wins, EVMs are fine. When they win in Jharkhand, EVMs function well. But the moment results in Maharashtra don’t favour them, EVMs suddenly become faulty or dishonest," said BJP National Secretary Manjinder Singh Sirsa in November.

"When they secured 99 seats (in LS polls), Rahul Gandhi was patting his back, claiming they defeated PM Modi. But if the BJP wins 240 seats, then EVMs are to blame. This hypocrisy is the reason why they lack credibility," he added.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Our EVMs have proven their reliability election after election. The multiple layers of security and verification processes give me confidence in our system. Unlike the US, we don't rely on internet-connected devices for voting. Proud of our election commission! 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
While I appreciate the security measures, I think we should still push for more transparency. Maybe allowing more political parties to audit the machines before elections would build even more trust. The VVPAT system is good but could be used more extensively.
A
Amit S.
The opposition's selective outrage about EVMs is so obvious! When they win, machines are perfect. When they lose, suddenly EVMs are faulty. This article exposes their hypocrisy perfectly 👏
S
Sunita P.
As someone who's worked as a polling officer, I can confirm how rigorously these machines are tested. From mock polls to sealing procedures, everything is done with representatives from all parties present. The process is more transparent than people think!
V
Vikram J.
Interesting comparison between US and Indian systems. Our standalone EVMs with no connectivity definitely seem more secure than networked voting machines. But we should keep innovating to stay ahead of potential threats.
N
Neha R.
The Supreme Court has already validated EVMs multiple times. How much more proof do people need? Instead of blaming machines, parties should focus on better policies and governance. The numbers don't lie!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Tags:
You May Like!