Madras HC directs Shivaji Ganesan's son Ramkumar to renounce ownership claims on Chennai property

IANS April 7, 2025 407 views

The Madras High Court has issued a significant directive to Ram Kumar, the elder son of legendary actor Sivaji Ganesan, regarding the iconic Annai Illam property in Chennai. The legal battle stems from a complex loan dispute involving Ram Kumar's son Dusshyanth and his film production company, Eshan Productions. Justice Abdul Quddhose ordered Ram Kumar to submit an affidavit renouncing any ownership claims on the property. The case highlights intricate family property and financial legal challenges in the Tamil film industry.

"No counter-affidavit was filed by the family to contest the execution petition" - Court Document
Chennai, April 7: The Madras High Court on Monday directed Ram Kumar, the elder son of legendary Tamil actor, late Sivaji Ganesan, to file an affidavit stating that he will not assert any claim over 'Annai Illam', the iconic bungalow built by his father in Chennai's T. Nagar.

Key Points

1

Madras HC directs Ramkumar to renounce Annai Illam property

2

Loan dispute involves Dhanabakkiam Enterprises and Eshan Productions

3

Property valued at Rs 88.5 crore with complex legal implications

Justice Abdul Quddhose issued the directive while hearing a plea filed by actor Prabhu Ganesan, the younger son of Sivaji Ganesan, who sought the removal of an attachment order placed on Annai Illam, which had been enacted due to the non-repayment of a loan by Ram Kumar's son, Dusshyanth, and his wife Abirami.

Senior counsel P.R. Raman, representing Prabhu Ganesan, argued that the property was legally transferred to his client and, therefore, should not be subject to recovery proceedings related to a loan he did not borrow. He asserted that Prabhu Ganesan's property rights could not be encumbered by obligations incurred by his nephew.

Counsel appearing for Ram Kumar informed the court that his client no longer holds any share in the property.

Taking this into account, Justice Quddhose directed Ram Kumar to submit an affidavit formally renouncing any present or future ownership claim over Annai Illam. The matter has been adjourned to Tuesday for further proceedings.

The legal dispute stems from a financial agreement between Dhanabakkiam Enterprises and Eshan Productions, a film company owned by Dusshyanth and his wife.

According to Akshay Sarin, a partner at Dhanabakkiam Enterprises, a loan of Rs 3.75 crore was extended to Eshan Productions in 2017 for the production of the film "Jagajala Killadi".

When the couple failed to repay the loan, the matter was taken to arbitration.

On May 4, 2024, arbitrator Justice T. Ravindran (retired) ruled in favour of Dhanabakkiam Enterprises, ordering the repayment of Rs 9.02 crore, which includes the principal amount and 30 per cent interest, with an additional 12 per cent annual interest until full settlement.

The arbitrator also granted Sarin the right to exploit and sell the film to recover the dues. However, the film was reportedly incomplete and not in a saleable format, prompting Sarin to file an execution petition before the High Court.

The petition sought to recover dues by attaching Ram Kumar's supposed one-fourth share in Annai Illam, a sprawling property spread over approximately 53,240 square feet.

Despite multiple opportunities for an amicable settlement through mediation, negotiations failed.

While Dhanabakkiam Enterprises demanded Rs 9.39 crore in total, the actor's family offered a one-time settlement of only Rs 2.75 crore in addition to prior payments. No counter-affidavit was filed by the family to contest the execution petition on its merits.

Consequently, Justice Quddhose ordered the attachment of 13,310 square feet of Annai Illam and instructed the petitioner to communicate the order to the T. Nagar Sub-Registrar. The Sub-Registrar subsequently recorded the attachment in the property's encumbrance certificate. Dhanabakkiam Enterprises has valued the entire property at Rs 88.5 crore, estimating Ram Kumar's one-fourth share at ₹22.15 crore--an amount considered sufficient to recover the loan dues.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
Such a sad situation for such an iconic family property. Sivaji Ganesan's legacy deserves better than these legal battles 😔 Hope they can resolve this amicably soon.
R
Rajesh M.
The interest rate seems extremely high - 30% plus 12% annually? That's practically predatory lending. The court should look into whether these terms were fair.
S
Saranya P.
Annai Illam is such a landmark in Chennai! I remember walking past it as a child and being in awe. It would be heartbreaking if it gets divided or sold because of this dispute.
K
Karthik V.
Film financing is always risky business. The production company should have had better safeguards before taking such a huge loan. Now the whole family is paying the price.
A
Anitha R.
Prabhu Ganesan is absolutely right - why should his property be affected by his nephew's debts? The court made the correct decision here. Family matters shouldn't mix with business liabilities.
M
Manoj S.
The valuation of ₹88.5 crore seems inflated for that area. I live nearby and property prices aren't that high. The court should get an independent valuation done.
D
Deepa N.
This is why wealthy families need better financial planning and legal structures. A simple trust arrangement could have prevented all this drama. Hope others learn from this case!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Tags:
You May Like!