LS Speaker reprimands Sonia Gandhi over Waqf bill 'bulldozed' remarks

IANS April 4, 2025 250 views

The Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla strongly rebuked Sonia Gandhi for her controversial remarks about the Waqf Amendment Bill being forcefully passed. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju supported the Speaker, emphasizing that the bill underwent extensive discussion spanning over 17 hours. Gandhi had claimed the bill was a "brazen assault on the Constitution" during a Congress Parliamentary Party meeting. The incident highlights the ongoing tensions between the ruling party and the opposition in parliamentary proceedings.

"The bill was in effect bulldozed through. Our party's position is clear." - Sonia Gandhi
LS Speaker reprimands Sonia Gandhi over Waqf bill 'bulldozed' remarks
New Delhi, April 4: Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Friday reprimanded former Congress president Sonia Gandhi over her remarks that the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was bulldozed through the Parliament.

Key Points

1

Om Birla criticizes Sonia Gandhi's claims about Waqf Bill passage

2

Parliamentary debate lasted 17 hours with multiple voting rounds

3

Kiren Rijiju highlights extensive legislative discussion

Taking strong objection to her claims of Waqf Bill passed ‘forcefully’ in the House, Om Birla termed the comments as ‘unfortunate’ and said that the allegations by senior Congress member was a violation of the democratic norms of the Parliament.

The Speaker noted that the bill was discussed for 13 hours and 53 minutes, with every party participating in the debate and followed by three rounds of voting but despite that Congress member was making such allegations.

“Three rounds of voting were conducted, and the Bill was passed according to the rules of the House. It is unfortunate that, despite following all the parliamentary procedures, such allegations are being made. This is not in line with the democratic norms of Parliament," Speaker said.

Om Birla’s objection to Sonia’s claims of Waqf bill ‘bulldozed through’ the Parliament came after Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju raised the matter in Lok Sabha today.

Rijiju, alluding to Congress RS MP Sonia Gandhi, said that extensive discussions took place in both the Houses over the Waqf bill, still the Opposition was making ‘baseless and absurd’ claims that the bill was passed with force.

He also demanded that the Speaker issues an “appropriate order” in response to these remarks.

Rijiju also highlighted that the Waqf reform debate broke the previous record of longest discussion in the Rajya Sabha.

“The previous record for a long discussion in the Rajya Sabha was during the ESMA (Essential Services Maintenance Act) discussion in 1981, which lasted for 16 hours and 51 minutes. Yesterday, this record was broken with a 17-hour and 2-minute discussion, making it the longest debate so far,” he informed the House.

A day ago, after Lok Sabha passed the Waqf Bill after marathon debate, Sonia Gandhi made her displeasure over the amendments known to party leaders, while addressing the Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP) meet yesterday. She stated that the bill was bulldozed through the House and termed it a brazen assault on the Constitution.

"Yesterday, the Wakf Amendment Bill, 2024 was passed in the Lok Sabha and today it is scheduled to come up in the Rajya Sabha. The bill was in effect bulldozed through. Our party's position is clear. The Bill is a brazen assault on the Constitution itself,” she said.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
The Speaker has a point here. 13+ hours of debate and 3 rounds of voting doesn't sound like bulldozing to me. Maybe Sonia Gandhi should check the facts before making such statements. 🤔
P
Priya M.
Breaking records for longest debate but still calling it "bulldozed"? Doesn't add up. Both sides need to be more careful with their words in Parliament.
A
Amit S.
While I respect Sonia Gandhi's concerns, the numbers speak for themselves. 17 hours of discussion is more than enough time for any bill. Maybe the focus should be on the content of the bill rather than the process?
S
Sunita R.
Interesting how the same process is called "democratic" by one side and "bulldozing" by the other. Shows how polarized our politics has become. 😕
V
Vikram J.
Respectful criticism: The Speaker could have handled this more diplomatically. Public reprimands like this only escalate tensions when we need more constructive dialogue in Parliament.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Tags:
You May Like!