'Kangana Ranaut's electricity bill not Rs 1 lakh, it includes arrears and high consumption': HPSEBL MD

ANI April 10, 2025 165 views

HPSEBL's Managing Director, Sandeep Kumar, clarified the controversy surrounding Kangana Ranaut's electricity bill. The bill totaling approximately Rs 91,000 includes arrears and charges for multiple months, not just a single billing cycle. Kumar highlighted that Kangana's electricity consumption is significantly higher due to a connected load of 94 kilowatts. He also mentioned that Kangana's team did not contact HPSEBL before the issue was raised publicly.

"Her domestic connection load is 94 kilowatts, which is about 1500% more than the standard domestic meter load." - Sandeep Kumar
Shimla, April 10: Amid a growing controversy surrounding Bollywood actress and BJP Mandi parliamentary constituency MP Kangana Ranaut's electricity bill, the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Board Limited (HPSEBL) has issued a clarification.

Key Points

1

Bill includes arrears not a single month

2

Kangana's load 1500% more than average

3

Unpaid bills led to higher amount

4

No prior inquiry by Kangana's team before going public

Speaking to ANI, Sandeep Kumar, the Managing Director of HPSEBL, addressed Kangana Ranaut's alleged inflated power bill.

"Kangana Ranaut, the Member of Parliament from Mandi parliamentary constituency, had raised an issue in the media, claiming that the electricity board had sent her a bill of Rs 1 lakh. I would like to clarify that the bill was not of Rs 1 lakh but Rs 91,000 and some hundred rupees," Kumar stated.

He further explained that the amount in question was not a single month's bill but a cumulative amount covering multiple billing cycles and arrears. According to Kumar, Kangana cleared her November and December bills only on January 16, and she had not paid her January and February bills either. The 20-day billing cycle of March had already passed by the time the bill was generated.

"There is an arrear of approximately Rs 31,000 to Rs 32,000, and her bill for 28 days of March alone was around Rs 55,000. Together with other charges, the total came to around Rs 91,000," he added. He emphasised that had the payments been made on time, the amount would not have appeared as high.

Kumar also clarified that no one from Kangana's side had approached the electricity board directly before the issue was raised publicly. "Neither did anyone confidentially inquire from us, nor did we release any statement until now. We have since issued a press note to clarify the situation, Kumar said.

Importantly, the board confirmed that Kangana also received a subsidy of Rs 700, which was applied to her bill, following the regular procedure.

Addressing the technical aspects, Kumar stated that Kangana's connected load is significantly higher than the average domestic user. "Her domestic connection load is 94 kilowatts, which is about 1500% more than the standard domestic meter load."

"In March alone, during 28 days, she consumed around 9,000 units of electricity," he added.

"The power being consumed is at her residence, and this bill pertains solely to that connection. If there are any other connections in her name, I am not aware of them." Kumar said.

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Wow, 9000 units in 28 days? That's insane! 😳 I barely use 300 units in a month. What exactly is she running there? A mini factory? The board's clarification makes sense though - bills pile up when you don't pay on time.
P
Priya M.
Why make such a big deal about the bill in media first instead of just contacting the electricity board? Seems like unnecessary drama. The explanation from HPSEBL is quite detailed and reasonable.
A
Amit S.
Respectful criticism here: While the board's clarification is helpful, they should be more proactive in communicating with high-consumption customers before bills become this large. A simple SMS alert about accumulating arrears could prevent such situations.
S
Sunita R.
I'm more concerned about the electricity usage - 94kW domestic load is crazy high! We need more awareness about energy conservation, especially among high-profile people who can influence others. 🌱
V
Vikram J.
At least the electricity board was transparent with their calculations. The subsidy of ₹700 shows they're treating her like any other consumer. No special favors, which is good to see!
N
Neha P.
This whole situation could have been avoided with timely payments. Lesson for all of us - pay your bills on time! Also interesting to see how much electricity big houses consume compared to normal homes.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Tags:
You May Like!