India needs innovation, needs to deregulate hugely: UPSC member Raj Shukla at Carnegie WTS Summit

ANI April 12, 2025 149 views

Lt Gen Raj Shukla delivered a powerful message about India's innovation ecosystem at the Carnegie Global Technology Summit. He emphasized that excessive regulation stifles technological progress and competitiveness. Shukla argued that India possesses tremendous talent but needs significant regulatory reforms to unleash its potential. The speech highlighted the critical need for adaptive policies that can support algorithmic innovation and strategic market transformations.

"Innovation doesn't happen at the rate of regulation" - Lt Gen Raj Shukla, UPSC Member
New Delhi, April 11: Stressing deregulation to foster innovation, Lt Gen (retd) Raj Shukla, a member of the Union Public Service Commission, on Friday said that India has talent and has to infuse more competitiveness.

Key Points

1

India must deregulate to unlock technological potential

2

Strategic market transformation requires cultural shifts

3

Trade agreements must balance national interests

"At the heart of Deepseek is algorithmic innovation, which comes from talent. I'm making this whole point that - we need innovation, but innovations and regulations don't go together. Innovaiton doesn't happen at the rate of regulation. We have a lot of talent - if that has to take off, we are to get to algorithmic innovation, we need to deregulate hugely. Innovation will not happen unless there is deregulation," Raj Shukla said speaking at the Carnegie India Global Technological Summit.

"We also need to make this transition. Our whole processes and procedures in the strategic military space were set up for what was a monopsony market. One buyer, one seller, no real choice, that kind of thing... Now, in this technology commercial markets, this will not work. One thing is deregulation, the other is cultural transitions. L1 and such. We will have to change these things. China has thrown it out of the window long back, the USA is doing it. We need to do it. If we don't do it, there will be severe consequences," he added.

Speaking at the Summit, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Friday said one cannot compromise with national interest just to meet trade agreement deadlines. The Minister said that at the end of the day, trade agreements have to be win-win for both sides.

"You always need to have timelines for all deadlines for whatever work you do. We do that in business all the time, don't we? Every action should be defined in terms of a responsibility that takes a timeline, but in the case of retail agreements, these are indicated timelines...," the Commerce Minister said, speaking at the Carnegie Global Technology Summit here in the national capital.

"But at the end of the day, it has to be a win-win for both sides. It has to be a fair, equitable, and balanced solution. Just to meet the deadline, you cannot compromise national interest," he added.

India is currently working on trade agreements with many countries and blocks of nations, including with the EU, the UK, and the US. India-US trade deal is expected to inked by the fall of 2025. India-EU FTA is expected by the end of 2025.

On the trade deal with the EU, Goyal said the severity of the non-tariff barriers that Europe has created, particularly on climate regulations, have created road blocks.

"Unless Europe recognizes the path that they are going down, if I can say it down a little bit, I see serious difficulty for Europe to be able to do trade with any country to get India. I am actually a worried man for the very future of the European Union and their position, given the kind of dramatically difficult non-tariff barriers that they have set up, both for their own benefit and for the benefit of the people," he explained.

"There'll be two areas on which the European Union will have to rethink. One is these non-trade issues with the seek to superimpose into trade agenda. Unless they get that out of their system and the European Commission will need to reflect on it, they'll find it very difficult to get a trade agreement with anybody whatsoever. Any self-respecting decent country cannot sign up on commitments which are irrational beyond the realm of trade and where. The rest of the world has been responsible for the problem in the first place and has sought to be put on our head as if it's our responsibility to resolve," he said, stressing upon Europe's climate regulations.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
Finally someone said it! Our bureaucracy is choking innovation at every step. The L1 system needs to go - we can't keep buying the cheapest when we need the best for national security. 👏
A
Amit S.
While I agree with deregulation in principle, we can't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Some regulations exist to protect workers and consumers. The challenge is finding the right balance.
R
Rahul V.
Interesting points about Europe's climate regulations. They can't expect developing nations to bear the same burden as countries that industrialized first. Fair trade means fair responsibilities too.
S
Sunita M.
As a startup founder, I've wasted months just getting approvals. The talent is here but the system kills motivation. Hope this discussion leads to real change! 🤞
K
Karan P.
Respectfully disagree on complete deregulation. Look at what happened with crypto - no rules led to scams. We need smart regulation that evolves with technology, not no regulation at all.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Tags:
You May Like!