India should avoid FTA with US, should go for limited Zero-to-Zero tariff deal, suggests GTRI

ANI April 10, 2025 174 views

The Global Trade Research Initiative has issued a critical warning about potential comprehensive trade negotiations with the United States. Their report suggests India should avoid a full Free Trade Agreement that could compromise key economic sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. Instead, they recommend a limited "Zero-to-Zero" tariff deal covering 90% of industrial goods, similar to Europe's model. The analysis highlights potential risks including weakened farmer support systems, increased foreign market access, and potential industrial sector vulnerabilities.

"Avoid a comprehensive FTA with the US as it would force India to make damaging concessions" - GTRI Report
New Delhi, April 10: As Donald Trump announced pause on tariffs for 90 days for trade negotiations, India should avoid signing a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the United States, as it may require India to make harmful trade-offs, suggested Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI).

Key Points

1

India should pursue limited zero-tariff deal on industrial goods

2

Comprehensive FTA risks farmer and industry livelihoods

3

US trade demands could harm domestic economic interests

4

Alternative trade partnerships with EU, UK and Canada recommended

Instead, GTRI said, India should consider a limited "Zero-to-Zero" tariff deal on 90 per cent of industrial goods, a model already offered by Europe to the U.S.

It said, "Avoid a comprehensive FTA with the US as it would force India to make damaging concessions. It's a deal that would cost India more than it gains. Restrict to Zero for zero deal on 90 per cent industrial Goods. Europe has offered similar deal to the US."

The report warned that a full FTA with the US could turn out to be a costly mistake. It highlights several demands by Washington that could hurt India's key sectors.

These include weakening India's minimum support price (MSP) system for farmers, allowing genetically modified food imports, reducing agricultural tariffs, changing patent laws to extend drug monopolies, and letting US e-commerce giants sell directly to Indian consumers.

Such changes, GTRI said, would endanger farmer incomes, threaten food security and biodiversity, affect public health, and harm small retailers. Reducing farm tariffs could impact the livelihoods of hundreds of millions of Indians.

Similarly, cutting duties on automobiles could damage India's auto industry, which contributes nearly one-third to the country's manufacturing output. The report cites the collapse of Australia's car industry after it slashed tariffs in the 1990s as a cautionary example.

The report also criticized India's past practice of offering unilateral trade concessions to the US, noting that such gestures have been dismissed by President Donald Trump as "kissing my a**."

The report advised India to focus instead on FTAs with the European Union, United Kingdom, and Canada, and explore broader partnerships with China and Russia. Strengthening trade ties with Japan, South Korea, and ASEAN countries is also recommended.

Finally, the report highlighted the potential of building joint product value chains with China in sectors like chemicals, machinery, and electronics. By using each other's raw materials and parts, both countries could boost local value in finished products for both domestic use and export.

This approach, the report said, deserves serious attention from both industry and policymakers.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
Finally someone talking sense! Our farmers and small businesses need protection. Zero-to-zero on industrial goods makes much more sense than giving away everything. 👏
P
Priya M.
Interesting perspective but I wonder if we're being too cautious. The US market is huge - shouldn't we try to get better access for our IT and pharma sectors?
A
Amit S.
The comparison with Australia's auto industry is eye-opening. We've worked so hard to build 'Make in India' - can't let it collapse for short-term gains.
S
Sunita R.
While I agree with most points, I think the report underestimates how much we need US investment in green tech and semiconductors. Maybe there's middle ground?
V
Vikram J.
The China partnership idea is bold but makes economic sense. We can't keep ignoring the world's manufacturing hub while protecting our industries forever.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Tags:
You May Like!