EVMs in country absolutely safe, not being tampered with, says CEC Gyanesh Kumar

ANI April 12, 2025 176 views

The Chief Election Commissioner has strongly defended India's Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) against allegations of vulnerability raised by US politician Tulsi Gabbard. Gyanesh Kumar emphasized that Indian EVMs are manufactured by public sector units and have undergone rigorous legal scrutiny, making them impossible to tamper with. Congress leader Randeep Surjewala has questioned the Election Commission's and government's silence on Gabbard's claims, calling for a comprehensive investigation. The CEC remains confident in the electoral process, stating that five crore VVPAT slips have been counted with no reported discrepancies.

"In India, EVMs made by PSUs were used, and on these machines, legal scrutiny had been done" - Gyanesh Kumar, CEC
New Delhi, April 12: Amidst US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claims of finding evidence of massive vulnerabilities in EVM machines, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Saturday stated that Electronic Vending Machines (EVMs) in the country were absolutely safe and were not being tampered with.

Key Points

1

CEC confirms EVMs are completely tamper-proof

2

Tulsi Gabbard raises concerns about EVM vulnerabilities

3

Congress leader Surjewala demands investigation

4

Five crore VVPAT slips counted with no discrepancies

The CEC stated that wherever democracy was present, electoral rolls and election processes were different, and in some countries, electronic voting systems were used.

"In India, EVMs made by PSUs were used, and on these machines, legal scrutiny had been done, and the EVMs of India cannot be connected to Bluetooth infrared, and so it is not possible to tamper with them," Kumar stated.

The CEC said India's EVMS are tamper-proof, five crore VVPAT slips have been counted, and no discrepancies have been reported.

"We want to assure the voters of India that the EVMs are completely safe," he further stated.

Earlier on April 11, Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala questioned the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the Central government for not responding to US politician Tulsi Gabbard's remarks on the vulnerability of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs).

He also urged the Supreme Court to take suo moto cognizance of the issue. Taking on X, Surjewala said that Gabbard, the US Director of National Intelligence, had publicly raised the issue of EVM hacking.

He quoted Gabbard as having said that EVMs are "vulnerable to exploitation to manipulate the results of the votes being cast."

Raising a series of questions, Surjewala asked why the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commission's official handle were silent on the matter and accused the poll body of planting "source-based stories" to counter Gabbard's statement.

Surjewala further questioned the silence of the Prime Minister, the NDA government, and the BJP. "Why are PM, NDA Govt & BJP 'mum'?" he wrote.

"Shouldn't the ECI & Modi Govt reaching out to U.S Govt and Ms. Gabbard to collect all the details of hacking & other vulnerabilities of EVM's and testing our EVM's viz a viz these fallibilities in EVM's?" he asked.

Referring to Gabbard's recent felicitation in India on March 17, Surjewala said it was less than a month ago that she was honoured in the country.

"Is it fair and just to outrightly rubbish and reject the statement made by the Director of National Intelligence of the U.S., whom we felicitated?" he asked.

The Congress leader further asked, "Is it fair and just to outrightly rubbish and reject the statement made by the Director of National Intelligence of the U.S., whom we felicitated on 17th March, less than a month ago?"

Surjewala also urged the Supreme Court of India to take suo motu notice of the matter and initiate a thorough investigation.

"Should the Supreme Court of India not take suo moto notice of the issue and conduct a thorough investigation, considering that free and fair elections and democracy are part of the Constitution's 'basic structure'?" he posted on X.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
Glad to hear this clarification from the CEC! EVMs have worked well for us so far and I trust our election process. Let's not create unnecessary doubts without concrete evidence. 🇮🇳
R
Rahul S.
While I appreciate the CEC's assurance, shouldn't we at least investigate the concerns raised? Better safe than sorry when it comes to democracy. A third-party audit could put all doubts to rest.
A
Amit P.
Interesting how the opposition jumps on any foreign comment that suits their narrative. If EVMs were really vulnerable, wouldn't all parties be complaining? The 5 crore VVPAT count speaks for itself.
S
Sunita M.
As someone who has worked as a polling officer, I can confirm EVMs are extremely secure. The entire process has multiple checks and balances. People spreading doubts should first understand how the system actually works!
V
Vikram J.
The timing of these allegations is suspicious. Right before elections, suddenly foreign "experts" discover vulnerabilities? 🤔 Our EVMs have stood the test of time and multiple court cases.
N
Neha T.
I think we need more transparency. While I don't believe there's large-scale tampering, making the EVM source code open for public scrutiny would be a great confidence-building measure. Democracy thrives on trust!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Tags:
You May Like!