Delhi HC refuses stay on SFIO case against Kerala CM Vijayan's daughter

IANS April 9, 2025 396 views

The Delhi High Court has refused to grant a stay on the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) probe against Veena Vijayan, daughter of Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. The case involves allegations of her IT firm Exalogic receiving Rs 2.70 crore in illegal gratification from a mining company. With no stay granted, the Enforcement Directorate can now proceed with its investigation based on the SFIO charge sheet. The development could potentially create significant legal challenges for Veena Vijayan and her family.

"No stay granted means ED can proceed with findings" - Shaun George, Kerala BJP Leader
Delhi HC refuses stay on SFIO case against Kerala CM Vijayan's daughter
New Delhi/Thiruvananthapuram, April 9: In a jolt to Veena Vijayan, daughter of Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused a stay of the probe by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) into allegations of her (now defunct) IT firm Exalogic receiving monthly gratification to the tune of Rs 2.70 crore from Kochi-based Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL), for mining sanctions,

Key Points

1

Delhi High Court refuses stay on SFIO probe against Veena Vijayan

2

Allegations of illegal payments from Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd

3

Enforcement Directorate can now move forward with investigation

As a bench of Justice Girish Kathpalia took up the case, the counsel for SFIO pointed out that the charge sheet has already been filed at a court in Kochi.

At this, the court said that there is nothing else to be done.

But as the judge was closing the case, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner CMRL, pointed out that when this case was previously heard by Justice Subramaniom Prasad, the SFIO had orally informed the court that they would not take further action.

On Sibal's mention, the court, after perusal of the papers, pointed out that there is no mention of such a thing according to the judicial records before the court.

But as Sibal reiterated the oral observation, the court decided to repost the case before Justice Prasad on April 22, as, according to Sibal, it was this judge to whom the SFIO had provided this assurance.

Meanwhile, with the court giving no stay, Veena Vijayan could find herself in a spot of bother as the Enforcement Directorate has already got the charge sheet filed by the SFIO about this illegal gratification at the court in Kochi.

Reacting to the developments in the Delhi High Court, Kerala BJP leader Shaun George, who is also a party in the case, said with no stay being granted, the ED can now go forward with the findings in the SFIO charge sheet, as it also involves money changing hands outside of the country.

The SFIO has all along maintained in the Delhi High Court that the payment made by the mining company CMRL to Exalogic constituted corruption and that the payment was made to ensure smooth operations for the CMRL.

This issue first surfaced when an Income Tax Settlement Board statement pointed out that Exalogic received this illegal gratification, and there was no service the IT firm had provided.

Incidentally, two petitions, filed earlier in the Kerala High Court and the other in the Karnataka High Court, challenging the SFIO investigation into the CMRL-Exalogic transactions, were dismissed.

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
This case keeps getting more interesting. If there's no service provided, why such huge payments? The courts seem to be taking it seriously which is good for transparency. Let's see what April 22 brings.
P
Priya M.
I'm all for investigating corruption, but I hope this isn't becoming political. The courts should decide purely on merit. 🤞
A
Arjun S.
The article could have explained the timeline better - when did these payments happen? How long did they continue? Context matters in such cases.
S
Sunita R.
2.7 crore per month?! That's insane money. If true, this is textbook corruption. No wonder ED is involved. Hope justice is served regardless of who's involved.
V
Vikram J.
Interesting how the case keeps bouncing between courts. The judicial system needs to be more efficient in handling such high-profile cases. Justice delayed is justice denied.
M
Meena P.
The IT firm was defunct but receiving payments? That's a huge red flag 🚩. Hope the investigation gets to the bottom of this without any political interference.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Tags:
You May Like!